Late-in-life investment check
This is an email I sent to my sister-in-law replying to one she sent me (found under mine). I would appreciate your comments.
Frank Merton <fmerton@gmail.com>
3:48 AM (32 minutes ago)
to h
Hi Helen. As you know there are always people predicting a huge crash, and sometimes they are right. I tend to ignore this sort of thing as just noise. A guru coming on TV always has some prediction or other that he made correctly, generally they are fairly good but luck has a huge role here. Now as to what I want to do. We have more than enough money and don't need gains, so I want to be in a short-term money market fund, where interest rates follow quickly. That is for safety, to keep what we have at our ages. I expect little gain for the next year or so and an increasing risk of a panic if one of these big AI hype companies goes bust and pulls in a lot of banks and others. This is because interest rates have gone up so fast to unnerve everyone. High interest rates compete with securities: why should one take the risks of the market when one can get a good income from the money market sort of thing. I don't think Doug understands at all, as he made uninformed remarks about safety and no government insurance, as though we have that now, so it led to my losing patience and some heat, and I backed down, as I tend to do. Our relationship is more important than our stock money and we will be perfectly well off even if half of it went away.
Frank Merton
fmerton@gmail.com
https://fmerton.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 3:25 PM h arrows <lardo60@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Frank,
We have been in the UK for 3 weeks and I haven't read much news about the stock market. Doug said you told him to sell all the stocks (according to Ernie), it is something I was thinking of doing with the equities. People have been harping about a huge crash (years) but it is becoming more insistent. I would like to know your thoughts on this... As it will be very expensive to do---taxes.
Are you finished with your Will?
Helen
Your email is clear, direct, and articulates a sound personal financial strategy. It balances your risk tolerance with your current stage of life, and it frames your family relationships above market gains.
Strengths of Your Email
Clear Investment Logic: Your reasoning for favoring short-term money market funds—seeking capital preservation and immediate yield adjustments without equity risk—is mathematically and strategically sound, especially in a higher-rate environment.
Realistic Risk Assessment: Mentioning the tax impact (which Helen explicitly asked about) alongside systemic risks like over-leveraged tech valuations shows a grounded perspective.
Prioritizing Relationships: The closing sentiment—that your relationship with Doug matters far more than portfolio fluctuations—is a strong, calming note to end on, particularly given Helen's concern over family dynamics.
Key Considerations & Suggested Adjustments
Clarifying the Tax Impact: Helen specifically noted that selling equities "will be very expensive to do---taxes." Your email addresses the market risk and yield dynamics, but it doesn't directly address her concern about realizing capital gains. Selling all equities at once can trigger a substantial, immediate tax hit. Acknowledging that capital preservation must be weighed against tax friction would make your advice even more practical for her situation.
Addressing the Misunderstanding with Doug: You mention that Doug made "uninformed remarks" regarding government insurance and money market safety. Money market funds are generally very safe (often holding short-term Treasuries or government-backed obligations), but they are not FDIC-insured like standard bank deposit accounts. If Doug's concern was technically about the lack of FDIC insurance, he isn't entirely wrong on the literal mechanism, even if the practical risk of a top-tier money market fund failing is extremely low. Framing this as a difference in risk interpretation rather than an "uninformed" remark might help smooth over the tension.
Softening the Tone Regarding Family Dynamics: Since Helen is Doug's sister (or family member) and spoke to Ernie about it, detailing your "loss of patience and some heat" with Doug might inadvertently triangulate the family disagreement. If your goal is to keep things low-friction, keeping the details of the argument private between you and Doug while reassuring Helen that you two are on the same page overall can prevent unnecessary family stress.
Suggested Revisions
Here are two options depending on how much detail you wish to share:
Option 1: Direct & Balanced (Polished Version)
Hi Helen,
As you know, there are always pundits predicting a market crash, and while some eventually guess right, I generally tune it out as noise. Media figures highlight their successful calls, but luck plays a massive role there.
As for our strategy: we are in a position where we don't need to chase aggressive market gains. Given our stage in life, my priority is capital preservation. Moving assets into short-term money market funds allows us to capture good yields that adjust quickly with interest rates, without taking on stock market volatility.
With elevated interest rates competing directly with equities, I don't see compelling reasons to take unnecessary market risks right now—especially with potential spillovers if highly valued sectors face a correction.
You mentioned the tax impact, which is a very real factor. Liquidating equities all at once can trigger a significant tax bill, so any move into safer instruments needs to weigh the tax drag against the protection gained.
Doug and I had a heated discussion about safety and insurance mechanisms, but we backed off. Our relationship is far more important than stock portfolio moves, and we will be perfectly fine regardless of short-term market swings.
Hope you enjoy the rest of your time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Shorter & De-escalated
Hi Helen,
Market crash predictions are constant, and I treat most of it as market noise. That said, at our age, we don't need to take big risks to grow our wealth—protecting what we have is the primary goal.
My preference for short-term money market funds comes down to safety and taking advantage of solid yields without taking on equity market risk. However, as you rightly noted, selling equities can trigger significant capital gains taxes, so the tax impact always has to be factored into any big portfolio shift.
Doug and I had a brief, heated debate about money market safety vs. bank insurance, but I stepped back. Family always comes first, and our portfolio is secure enough that we don't need to stress over differences in market outlooks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
The tax aspect: about half is in an IRA, so the tax comes with annual mandatory withdrawal, and this happens regardless of where the funds are invested. The benefit of a money market fund here is that when it comes time to make the mandatory withdrawal, stocks don't have to be sold. The rest, our "street fund" is in some very long term holdings. My instruction to Doug was to look at them closely, see which ones are overpriced and which ones are lagging, and make decisions case by case, but to try to go at least half into the fund. As for family angst, that goes on with us all the time. I think it best they know.
Your tax strategy for the IRA and "street fund" (taxable brokerage) adds critical context that makes your reasoning much stronger.
Selling inside a tax-advantaged IRA triggers zero capital gains tax, so shifting those assets into a money market fund incurs no tax penalty at all. Furthermore, having cash equivalents ready in the IRA prevents you from being forced to sell depressed equities at a loss just to satisfy Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) during a market downturn.
For the taxable "street fund," taking a surgical, stock-by-stock approach rather than an all-or-nothing liquidation is the right way to manage capital gains exposure while still de-risking.
Key Adjustments for Your Reply
Clarify the IRA Advantage: Point out that half the money sits in an IRA where trades carry zero immediate tax consequences, and explain how money market funds protect RMDs during a downturn.
Explain the Taxable Strategy: Clarify that you aren't dumping all taxable stocks at once, but rather rebalancing selectively on a case-by-case basis to manage capital gains.
Address Family Dynamics: Validate your decision to keep open communication with Helen, while framing the exchange as an active discussion on risk strategy rather than a rift.
Revised Email Options
Option 1: Detailed & Clear (Incorporating your exact tax strategy)
Hi Helen,
Thanks for raising the tax point—it’s an important distinction here.
About half of our assets are in an IRA. Changing investments inside an IRA creates zero capital gains tax. Because required withdrawals happen every year regardless of where the money sits, moving IRA assets into a money market fund ensures we won't be forced to sell equities at a bottom just to satisfy mandatory withdrawals during a crash.
As for our taxable account ("street fund"), I am not suggesting we liquidate everything at once. My instruction to Doug was to review those long-term holdings line by line—trimming overvalued or lagging positions to move toward a ~50% cash/money market posture while managing the capital gains impact case by case.
As for Doug and me, tension and debate over these decisions are pretty standard for us, and I prefer being transparent about where we stand. Our priority remains keeping what we have safe at our stage of life without taking unnecessary market risk.
Hope you're having a wonderful time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Concise & Direct
Hi Helen,
The tax impact actually breaks down cleanly depending on the account type:
IRA Account (~50% of funds): Zero tax hit for rebalancing inside an IRA. Having this in a money market fund protects us from having to sell stocks during a crash to cover mandatory annual withdrawals.
Taxable Account: We aren't doing a blanket sale. I asked Doug to look at our holdings case-by-case—selling overvalued or lagging stocks selectively to get to roughly 50% short-term funds while controlling tax drag.
Family debates over money are par for the course with us, so I prefer keeping things open. At our age, preserving capital matters far more than taking equity risks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.
This is an email I sent to my sister-in-law replying to one she sent me (found under mine). I would appreciate your comments.
Frank Merton <fmerton@gmail.com>
3:48 AM (32 minutes ago)
to h
Hi Helen. As you know there are always people predicting a huge crash, and sometimes they are right. I tend to ignore this sort of thing as just noise. A guru coming on TV always has some prediction or other that he made correctly, generally they are fairly good but luck has a huge role here. Now as to what I want to do. We have more than enough money and don't need gains, so I want to be in a short-term money market fund, where interest rates follow quickly. That is for safety, to keep what we have at our ages. I expect little gain for the next year or so and an increasing risk of a panic if one of these big AI hype companies goes bust and pulls in a lot of banks and others. This is because interest rates have gone up so fast to unnerve everyone. High interest rates compete with securities: why should one take the risks of the market when one can get a good income from the money market sort of thing. I don't think Doug understands at all, as he made uninformed remarks about safety and no government insurance, as though we have that now, so it led to my losing patience and some heat, and I backed down, as I tend to do. Our relationship is more important than our stock money and we will be perfectly well off even if half of it went away.
Frank Merton
fmerton@gmail.com
https://fmerton.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 3:25 PM h arrows <lardo60@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Frank,
We have been in the UK for 3 weeks and I haven't read much news about the stock market. Doug said you told him to sell all the stocks (according to Ernie), it is something I was thinking of doing with the equities. People have been harping about a huge crash (years) but it is becoming more insistent. I would like to know your thoughts on this... As it will be very expensive to do---taxes.
Are you finished with your Will?
Helen
Your email is clear, direct, and articulates a sound personal financial strategy. It balances your risk tolerance with your current stage of life, and it frames your family relationships above market gains.
Strengths of Your Email
Clear Investment Logic: Your reasoning for favoring short-term money market funds—seeking capital preservation and immediate yield adjustments without equity risk—is mathematically and strategically sound, especially in a higher-rate environment.
Realistic Risk Assessment: Mentioning the tax impact (which Helen explicitly asked about) alongside systemic risks like over-leveraged tech valuations shows a grounded perspective.
Prioritizing Relationships: The closing sentiment—that your relationship with Doug matters far more than portfolio fluctuations—is a strong, calming note to end on, particularly given Helen's concern over family dynamics.
Key Considerations & Suggested Adjustments
Clarifying the Tax Impact: Helen specifically noted that selling equities "will be very expensive to do---taxes." Your email addresses the market risk and yield dynamics, but it doesn't directly address her concern about realizing capital gains. Selling all equities at once can trigger a substantial, immediate tax hit. Acknowledging that capital preservation must be weighed against tax friction would make your advice even more practical for her situation.
Addressing the Misunderstanding with Doug: You mention that Doug made "uninformed remarks" regarding government insurance and money market safety. Money market funds are generally very safe (often holding short-term Treasuries or government-backed obligations), but they are not FDIC-insured like standard bank deposit accounts. If Doug's concern was technically about the lack of FDIC insurance, he isn't entirely wrong on the literal mechanism, even if the practical risk of a top-tier money market fund failing is extremely low. Framing this as a difference in risk interpretation rather than an "uninformed" remark might help smooth over the tension.
Softening the Tone Regarding Family Dynamics: Since Helen is Doug's sister (or family member) and spoke to Ernie about it, detailing your "loss of patience and some heat" with Doug might inadvertently triangulate the family disagreement. If your goal is to keep things low-friction, keeping the details of the argument private between you and Doug while reassuring Helen that you two are on the same page overall can prevent unnecessary family stress.
Suggested Revisions
Here are two options depending on how much detail you wish to share:
Option 1: Direct & Balanced (Polished Version)
Hi Helen,
As you know, there are always pundits predicting a market crash, and while some eventually guess right, I generally tune it out as noise. Media figures highlight their successful calls, but luck plays a massive role there.
As for our strategy: we are in a position where we don't need to chase aggressive market gains. Given our stage in life, my priority is capital preservation. Moving assets into short-term money market funds allows us to capture good yields that adjust quickly with interest rates, without taking on stock market volatility.
With elevated interest rates competing directly with equities, I don't see compelling reasons to take unnecessary market risks right now—especially with potential spillovers if highly valued sectors face a correction.
You mentioned the tax impact, which is a very real factor. Liquidating equities all at once can trigger a significant tax bill, so any move into safer instruments needs to weigh the tax drag against the protection gained.
Doug and I had a heated discussion about safety and insurance mechanisms, but we backed off. Our relationship is far more important than stock portfolio moves, and we will be perfectly fine regardless of short-term market swings.
Hope you enjoy the rest of your time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Shorter & De-escalated
Hi Helen,
Market crash predictions are constant, and I treat most of it as market noise. That said, at our age, we don't need to take big risks to grow our wealth—protecting what we have is the primary goal.
My preference for short-term money market funds comes down to safety and taking advantage of solid yields without taking on equity market risk. However, as you rightly noted, selling equities can trigger significant capital gains taxes, so the tax impact always has to be factored into any big portfolio shift.
Doug and I had a brief, heated debate about money market safety vs. bank insurance, but I stepped back. Family always comes first, and our portfolio is secure enough that we don't need to stress over differences in market outlooks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
The tax aspect: about half is in an IRA, so the tax comes with annual mandatory withdrawal, and this happens regardless of where the funds are invested. The benefit of a money market fund here is that when it comes time to make the mandatory withdrawal, stocks don't have to be sold. The rest, our "street fund" is in some very long term holdings. My instruction to Doug was to look at them closely, see which ones are overpriced and which ones are lagging, and make decisions case by case, but to try to go at least half into the fund. As for family angst, that goes on with us all the time. I think it best they know.
Your tax strategy for the IRA and "street fund" (taxable brokerage) adds critical context that makes your reasoning much stronger.
Selling inside a tax-advantaged IRA triggers zero capital gains tax, so shifting those assets into a money market fund incurs no tax penalty at all. Furthermore, having cash equivalents ready in the IRA prevents you from being forced to sell depressed equities at a loss just to satisfy Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) during a market downturn.
For the taxable "street fund," taking a surgical, stock-by-stock approach rather than an all-or-nothing liquidation is the right way to manage capital gains exposure while still de-risking.
Key Adjustments for Your Reply
Clarify the IRA Advantage: Point out that half the money sits in an IRA where trades carry zero immediate tax consequences, and explain how money market funds protect RMDs during a downturn.
Explain the Taxable Strategy: Clarify that you aren't dumping all taxable stocks at once, but rather rebalancing selectively on a case-by-case basis to manage capital gains.
Address Family Dynamics: Validate your decision to keep open communication with Helen, while framing the exchange as an active discussion on risk strategy rather than a rift.
Revised Email Options
Option 1: Detailed & Clear (Incorporating your exact tax strategy)
Hi Helen,
Thanks for raising the tax point—it’s an important distinction here.
About half of our assets are in an IRA. Changing investments inside an IRA creates zero capital gains tax. Because required withdrawals happen every year regardless of where the money sits, moving IRA assets into a money market fund ensures we won't be forced to sell equities at a bottom just to satisfy mandatory withdrawals during a crash.
As for our taxable account ("street fund"), I am not suggesting we liquidate everything at once. My instruction to Doug was to review those long-term holdings line by line—trimming overvalued or lagging positions to move toward a ~50% cash/money market posture while managing the capital gains impact case by case.
As for Doug and me, tension and debate over these decisions are pretty standard for us, and I prefer being transparent about where we stand. Our priority remains keeping what we have safe at our stage of life without taking unnecessary market risk.
Hope you're having a wonderful time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Concise & Direct
Hi Helen,
The tax impact actually breaks down cleanly depending on the account type:
IRA Account (~50% of funds): Zero tax hit for rebalancing inside an IRA. Having this in a money market fund protects us from having to sell stocks during a crash to cover mandatory annual withdrawals.
Taxable Account: We aren't doing a blanket sale. I asked Doug to look at our holdings case-by-case—selling overvalued or lagging stocks selectively to get to roughly 50% short-term funds while controlling tax drag.
Family debates over money are par for the course with us, so I prefer keeping things open. At our age, preserving capital matters far more than taking equity risks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.
This is an email I sent to my sister-in-law replying to one she sent me (found under mine). I would appreciate your comments.
Frank Merton <fmerton@gmail.com>
3:48 AM (32 minutes ago)
to h
Hi Helen. As you know there are always people predicting a huge crash, and sometimes they are right. I tend to ignore this sort of thing as just noise. A guru coming on TV always has some prediction or other that he made correctly, generally they are fairly good but luck has a huge role here. Now as to what I want to do. We have more than enough money and don't need gains, so I want to be in a short-term money market fund, where interest rates follow quickly. That is for safety, to keep what we have at our ages. I expect little gain for the next year or so and an increasing risk of a panic if one of these big AI hype companies goes bust and pulls in a lot of banks and others. This is because interest rates have gone up so fast to unnerve everyone. High interest rates compete with securities: why should one take the risks of the market when one can get a good income from the money market sort of thing. I don't think Doug understands at all, as he made uninformed remarks about safety and no government insurance, as though we have that now, so it led to my losing patience and some heat, and I backed down, as I tend to do. Our relationship is more important than our stock money and we will be perfectly well off even if half of it went away.
Frank Merton
fmerton@gmail.com
https://fmerton.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 3:25 PM h arrows <lardo60@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Frank,
We have been in the UK for 3 weeks and I haven't read much news about the stock market. Doug said you told him to sell all the stocks (according to Ernie), it is something I was thinking of doing with the equities. People have been harping about a huge crash (years) but it is becoming more insistent. I would like to know your thoughts on this... As it will be very expensive to do---taxes.
Are you finished with your Will?
Helen
Your email is clear, direct, and articulates a sound personal financial strategy. It balances your risk tolerance with your current stage of life, and it frames your family relationships above market gains.
Strengths of Your Email
Clear Investment Logic: Your reasoning for favoring short-term money market funds—seeking capital preservation and immediate yield adjustments without equity risk—is mathematically and strategically sound, especially in a higher-rate environment.
Realistic Risk Assessment: Mentioning the tax impact (which Helen explicitly asked about) alongside systemic risks like over-leveraged tech valuations shows a grounded perspective.
Prioritizing Relationships: The closing sentiment—that your relationship with Doug matters far more than portfolio fluctuations—is a strong, calming note to end on, particularly given Helen's concern over family dynamics.
Key Considerations & Suggested Adjustments
Clarifying the Tax Impact: Helen specifically noted that selling equities "will be very expensive to do---taxes." Your email addresses the market risk and yield dynamics, but it doesn't directly address her concern about realizing capital gains. Selling all equities at once can trigger a substantial, immediate tax hit. Acknowledging that capital preservation must be weighed against tax friction would make your advice even more practical for her situation.
Addressing the Misunderstanding with Doug: You mention that Doug made "uninformed remarks" regarding government insurance and money market safety. Money market funds are generally very safe (often holding short-term Treasuries or government-backed obligations), but they are not FDIC-insured like standard bank deposit accounts. If Doug's concern was technically about the lack of FDIC insurance, he isn't entirely wrong on the literal mechanism, even if the practical risk of a top-tier money market fund failing is extremely low. Framing this as a difference in risk interpretation rather than an "uninformed" remark might help smooth over the tension.
Softening the Tone Regarding Family Dynamics: Since Helen is Doug's sister (or family member) and spoke to Ernie about it, detailing your "loss of patience and some heat" with Doug might inadvertently triangulate the family disagreement. If your goal is to keep things low-friction, keeping the details of the argument private between you and Doug while reassuring Helen that you two are on the same page overall can prevent unnecessary family stress.
Suggested Revisions
Here are two options depending on how much detail you wish to share:
Option 1: Direct & Balanced (Polished Version)
Hi Helen,
As you know, there are always pundits predicting a market crash, and while some eventually guess right, I generally tune it out as noise. Media figures highlight their successful calls, but luck plays a massive role there.
As for our strategy: we are in a position where we don't need to chase aggressive market gains. Given our stage in life, my priority is capital preservation. Moving assets into short-term money market funds allows us to capture good yields that adjust quickly with interest rates, without taking on stock market volatility.
With elevated interest rates competing directly with equities, I don't see compelling reasons to take unnecessary market risks right now—especially with potential spillovers if highly valued sectors face a correction.
You mentioned the tax impact, which is a very real factor. Liquidating equities all at once can trigger a significant tax bill, so any move into safer instruments needs to weigh the tax drag against the protection gained.
Doug and I had a heated discussion about safety and insurance mechanisms, but we backed off. Our relationship is far more important than stock portfolio moves, and we will be perfectly fine regardless of short-term market swings.
Hope you enjoy the rest of your time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Shorter & De-escalated
Hi Helen,
Market crash predictions are constant, and I treat most of it as market noise. That said, at our age, we don't need to take big risks to grow our wealth—protecting what we have is the primary goal.
My preference for short-term money market funds comes down to safety and taking advantage of solid yields without taking on equity market risk. However, as you rightly noted, selling equities can trigger significant capital gains taxes, so the tax impact always has to be factored into any big portfolio shift.
Doug and I had a brief, heated debate about money market safety vs. bank insurance, but I stepped back. Family always comes first, and our portfolio is secure enough that we don't need to stress over differences in market outlooks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
The tax aspect: about half is in an IRA, so the tax comes with annual mandatory withdrawal, and this happens regardless of where the funds are invested. The benefit of a money market fund here is that when it comes time to make the mandatory withdrawal, stocks don't have to be sold. The rest, our "street fund" is in some very long term holdings. My instruction to Doug was to look at them closely, see which ones are overpriced and which ones are lagging, and make decisions case by case, but to try to go at least half into the fund. As for family angst, that goes on with us all the time. I think it best they know.
Your tax strategy for the IRA and "street fund" (taxable brokerage) adds critical context that makes your reasoning much stronger.
Selling inside a tax-advantaged IRA triggers zero capital gains tax, so shifting those assets into a money market fund incurs no tax penalty at all. Furthermore, having cash equivalents ready in the IRA prevents you from being forced to sell depressed equities at a loss just to satisfy Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) during a market downturn.
For the taxable "street fund," taking a surgical, stock-by-stock approach rather than an all-or-nothing liquidation is the right way to manage capital gains exposure while still de-risking.
Key Adjustments for Your Reply
Clarify the IRA Advantage: Point out that half the money sits in an IRA where trades carry zero immediate tax consequences, and explain how money market funds protect RMDs during a downturn.
Explain the Taxable Strategy: Clarify that you aren't dumping all taxable stocks at once, but rather rebalancing selectively on a case-by-case basis to manage capital gains.
Address Family Dynamics: Validate your decision to keep open communication with Helen, while framing the exchange as an active discussion on risk strategy rather than a rift.
Revised Email Options
Option 1: Detailed & Clear (Incorporating your exact tax strategy)
Hi Helen,
Thanks for raising the tax point—it’s an important distinction here.
About half of our assets are in an IRA. Changing investments inside an IRA creates zero capital gains tax. Because required withdrawals happen every year regardless of where the money sits, moving IRA assets into a money market fund ensures we won't be forced to sell equities at a bottom just to satisfy mandatory withdrawals during a crash.
As for our taxable account ("street fund"), I am not suggesting we liquidate everything at once. My instruction to Doug was to review those long-term holdings line by line—trimming overvalued or lagging positions to move toward a ~50% cash/money market posture while managing the capital gains impact case by case.
As for Doug and me, tension and debate over these decisions are pretty standard for us, and I prefer being transparent about where we stand. Our priority remains keeping what we have safe at our stage of life without taking unnecessary market risk.
Hope you're having a wonderful time in the UK!
Best,
Frank
Option 2: Concise & Direct
Hi Helen,
The tax impact actually breaks down cleanly depending on the account type:
IRA Account (~50% of funds): Zero tax hit for rebalancing inside an IRA. Having this in a money market fund protects us from having to sell stocks during a crash to cover mandatory annual withdrawals.
Taxable Account: We aren't doing a blanket sale. I asked Doug to look at our holdings case-by-case—selling overvalued or lagging stocks selectively to get to roughly 50% short-term funds while controlling tax drag.
Family debates over money are par for the course with us, so I prefer keeping things open. At our age, preserving capital matters far more than taking equity risks.
Enjoy the rest of your trip in the UK!
Frank
Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.
No comments:
Post a Comment