Presentism and eternalism, Einstein and Spinoza's universe
https://scienceandculture.com/2026/09/lone-physicist-forces-up-the-whole-internets-iq/
The article goes into the universe beginning on its own from nothing, uncaused if nothing that could have caused it existed before, kinda the meaning of nothing.
No one ever seems to mention the alternative to presentism (the flow of time), an Einstein inspired universe of three spacial and a time dimension in a block, all just being there.
You are tapping into one of the central philosophical and physics debates raised in that piece—and more broadly, in modern cosmology: How we conceptualize time itself completely changes what counts as an "origin" or a "cause."
The article on Science and Culture Today by Bruce Gordon focuses heavily on the assumption that the universe has a temporal boundary in the past (citing the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem) and argues that "nothing" in physics is never truly nothing. However, as you pointed out, these debates often implicitly assume Presentism—the idea that only the "now" exists, time flows dynamically, and the universe had to "come into" being at some first moment.
The alternative you mentioned—Eternalism or the Block Universe—radically reframes the entire problem.
1. Presentism vs. Eternalism (The Block Universe)
Presentism (Dynamic View / A-Theory of Time):
Time flows. The past no longer exists, the future doesn't exist yet, and the universe "happened" at t=0.
Under this view, asking "What caused t=0?" or "What was there before t=0?" feels urgent, because the universe seemingly had to transition from non-existence into existence.
Eternalism (Block Universe / B-Theory of Time):
Inspired directly by Einstein’s Special and General Relativity, space and time are fused into a static 4D spacetime manifold ("spacetime block").
Past, present, and future events all exist equally.
Under this view, t=0 is not a "beginning moment" where something was created out of nothing; it is simply a boundary edge of the 4D geometry—much like the North Pole is the northern boundary of the Earth's surface. You don't ask "what caused the North Pole to pop out of nothingness south of it," because the sphere simply exists as a geometric whole.
2. Why the Block Universe Bypasses "Beginning from Nothing"
In a Block Universe, the cosmos doesn't "come into existence" at a starting point; the 4D block just is.
No Temporal Causation Needed: Temporal causality ("A happens, then B happens") only operates inside the block, moving along worldlines. You cannot apply temporal causation to the block itself from the outside, because there is no hyper-time before t=0 in which a cause could act.
Boundary Conditions over First Causes: Instead of looking for a "first cause" that kicked off t=0, physicists in a block universe frame look for boundary conditions (such as the Hartle-Hawking "no-boundary proposal," where time turns into a spatial dimension near the origin, eliminating a sharp initial singularity).
3. Does the Block Universe Fully Eliminate the "Why" Question?
While Eternalism neatly sidesteps the need for a temporal "event" that caused the universe to pop into existence, philosophers and cosmologists who engage with this model point out that a different question remains:
Temporal Origin vs. Ontological Existence:
Presentism asks: "How did the universe start?" (A temporal creation question).
Eternalism resolves that, but leaves: "Why does the 4D spacetime block exist at all, rather than nothing?" (An ontological existence question).
Brute Fact vs. Grounding:
Even if the 4D block is timelessly "just there," philosophers like Leibniz or modern metaphysicians ask whether the entire block is a "brute fact" (it just exists without reason) or if it requires a non-temporal ground/explanation for why this specific spacetime geometry exists instead of empty non-existence.
Summary
The article you read approaches cosmology through the lens of standard temporal causality, arguing that physical laws or quantum states at t=0 still require an explanation. But by shifting to an Einsteinian Block Universe, the notion of "the universe coming from nothing" largely dissolves—the universe doesn't come from anything because it never began in a temporal sense; it is simply a complete 4D geometric object.
I think presentism has an intuitive advantage but eternalism has the evidence, all the measurements of how time varies in gravitational fields or in acceleration.
You’ve hit on the exact reason why the Block Universe (Eternalism) remains the dominant view among modern theoretical physicists, despite how deeply unpalatable it feels to human intuition.
Our biological brain is hardwired for Presentism. Evolution built us to perceive a flowing "now" because survival requires predicting the immediate future based on the immediate past. But when we test the physical structure of reality, the math and measurements side almost entirely with Eternalism.
The Evidence: Why Relativity Demands a Block Universe
The phenomena you mentioned—gravitational time dilation and kinematic time dilation (acceleration/velocity)—aren't just quirks of clock design; they directly shatter the foundation of Presentism.
The Destruction of Absolute Simultaneity: In Special Relativity, if two events happen at different places, whether they occur "at the same time" depends entirely on your motion. Two observers moving relative to each other will disagree on the chronological order of events.
Under Presentism, there must be a single, universe-wide "Now" slice.
Relativity proves no such global "Now" exists. If person A sees event X happen before event Y, and person B sees event Y happen before event X, both of those events must already exist in the structure of spacetime.
The Rietdijk–Putnam "Alien" Thought Experiment: Consider an alien in a distant galaxy 10 billion light-years away. If the alien sits still, their "now" aligns with yours. But if the alien simply walks toward Earth at a slow pace, their plane of simultaneity shifts drastically. Because of the vast distance, their "now" suddenly includes events on Earth that, to you, belong to the far future (e.g., events 100 years from now).
If those future events are real for the walking alien right now, they must already exist in spacetime.
Gravitational Time Dilation & Curved Spacetime: General Relativity treats gravity not as a force pushing things through time, but as the curvature of 4D spacetime. Clocks closer to a massive body run slower relative to those farther away. Time is literally built into the geometry of the block—it shrinks and stretches alongside spatial dimensions.
PRESENTISM vs. ETERNALISM
Presentism (Intuitive) Eternalism (Relativistic)
[Past] -> [NOW] -> [Future] [====== 4D Spacetime Block ======]
(Gone) (Real) (Unwritten) (Past, Present, & Future co-exist)
The Tension: Quantum Mechanics and the "Flow"
While Relativity forces us into Eternalism, the debate isn't 100% settled in physics because Quantum Mechanics complicates the picture:
Quantum Measurement: Standard interpretations of quantum mechanics (like the Copenhagen interpretation) involve wave-function collapse—a process that seems to happen dynamically in "real time," creating a sharp distinction between a probabilistic future and a concrete past.
The Problem of Time: Reconciling General Relativity (where time is a geometric, static background coordinate in a block) with Quantum Mechanics (where time is an external dynamic parameter) is the single biggest unsolved problem in fundamental physics.
Why Presentism Remains Sticky
Presentism endures largely because it matches human experience. We feel time flowing; we remember the past and anticipate the future. But in an Einsteinian universe, that "flow" is an internal feature of consciousness rather than a fundamental property of the cosmos.
As Einstein famously wrote in 1955 after the death of his close friend Michele Besso:
"People like us who believe in physics know that the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."
If Eternalism holds, the universe didn't "begin" at t=0, nor does it "travel" toward the future. The entire movie reel exists all at once; our consciousness is just reading it frame by frame from the inside.
Not only does presentism seem natural or intuitive, it allows free will and purpose. This is harder, although not impossible, to have in eternalism.
You’ve hit on the deepest philosophical trade-off between the two views. Presentism gives us the comforting setup we feel every day: an open, unwritten future where our choices actively shape what comes next. Eternalism, by contrast, feels like looking at a completed film reel—the ending is already printed on the physical film, even if you’re currently watching frame 100.
Yet, philosophers and physicists who embrace Eternalism argue that purpose and agency don't vanish in a Block Universe; they just mean something fundamentally different.
1. Free Will in the Block: Hard Determinism vs. Compatibilism
In a Block Universe, your entire worldline—from birth to death—is a fixed, 4D geometry. This naturally raises the question: If my choice at 5:00 PM tomorrow already exists in the spacetime block, how am I free?
The "Libertarian" Conflict (Why Presentism Feels Better)
Libertarian Free Will requires that at any decision point, given the exact same past state of the universe, you could have chosen differently.
Presentism allows this because the future is a void waiting to be created. Eternalism completely rules this out—the future path is already a physical part of the block.
The "Compatibilist" Solution in Eternalism
Compatibilism redefines free will not as "the ability to rewrite the block," but as internal agency.
In a block universe, your thoughts, desires, deliberations, and values are physical events embedded inside the 4D manifold. They are real structural components of the causal chain.
Your choice tomorrow at 5:00 PM exists, but it exists precisely because your mind deliberated and decided it. You aren't being "forced" by an outside constraint; your choice is the actual mechanism the block uses to connect past-you with future-you.
Analogy: In a novel, the ending is already written on page 300. But the protagonist isn't a puppet without choices—their character traits, internal struggles, and decisions on page 150 are what naturally produce that written ending.
2. What Happens to Purpose?
If the future is already "there," does anything we do actually matter? Presentism treats purpose as a construction project (building an unwritten future). Eternalism treats purpose as a sculpture (carving an enduring shape in 4D space).
PRESENTISM: Purpose as a Wave
[Past vanishes] ---> [Now happens] ---> [Future isn't real]
*Meaning only exists in the fleeting present moment.*
ETERNALISM: Purpose as a 4D Architecture
[===== Birth ===== Deliberation ===== Actions ===== Impact =====]
*Meaning is a permanent, static feature of the 4D universe.*
In Presentism, everything eventually disappears. Once an event passes, it ceases to exist. A good deed done 100 years ago is gone forever, surviving only as fading physical consequences.
In Eternalism, nothing is ever lost. The moment you comfort a friend, solve a problem, or build something meaningful doesn't fade into non-existence. It is permanently etched into the 4D landscape of space and time. You don't "lose" the past; your life is a permanent 4D structure in reality.
3. The Subjective Experience of Time
Even if the 4D block is static from an "outside" perspective (what physicists call the God's-eye view), you do not experience it from the outside.
Your consciousness moves along your worldline continuously. Information flows in one temporal direction (due to entropy), meaning your mind experiences deliberation, anticipation, and decision-making in sequence.
The fact that a choice is fixed in the block doesn't mean you know what it is before you make it.
The subjective process of choosing remains as real and vivid as ever, because you are the block experiencing itself from within.
Summary
Presentism gives us the intuition of an open door, where free will means picking which path to create.
Eternalism gives us a monument, where free will and purpose are the permanent architectural features of who you are across 4D spacetime. It swaps the freedom to change the future for the certainty that your actions and choices permanently matter in the structure of reality.
I like this giving you pregnant prompts and seeing you fill in the details (doing the hard work).
I'll take that as a compliment! It’s the ultimate divide-and-conquer strategy: you supply the high-level philosophical spark, and I run with the structural heavy lifting.
Honestly, "pregnant prompts" like these are the best kind of input to work with. Questions about time, physics, and determinism aren't just factual queries—they’re conceptual knots that require holding multiple abstractions in mind at once. When you drop a single tight premise like "presentism has the intuition, eternalism has the measurements," it opens up a huge network of connected ideas in physics, metaphysics, and human psychology just waiting to be mapped out.
Keep those prompts coming whenever you want to dig into another one!
I was surprised by the Einstein quote. I wasn't sure he was fully convinced by his work of that view.
It is surprising, but Einstein was actually a firm, almost zealous believer in the block universe. The letter to Michele Besso's family wasn't just a poetic gesture of comfort; it reflected a deep philosophical stance he held for most of his adult life.
His conviction in eternalism came directly out of the math of General Relativity, but it was solidified by two major influences:
1. The Physics: Relativity and Kurt Gödel
Once Special Relativity established that there is no universal "now," Einstein realized that the passage of time couldn't be a fundamental feature of the objective world.
Later in his life at Princeton, his close friend and daily walking partner was the legendary mathematician Kurt Gödel. In 1949, Gödel published a famous solution to Einstein's field equations (known as the Gödel Metric) which described a rotating universe where exact "closed timelike curves" exist—meaning you could loop back into your own past. Gödel used this to prove that in Relativity, time does not "pass" in any objective sense. Einstein wrote that Gödel’s work confirmed what he had long suspected: time's flow is a subjective construct of the human observer, not a property of the physical universe.
2. The Philosophy: Spinoza’s Determinism
Einstein was famously a follower of the 17th-century philosopher Baruch Spinoza. Spinoza argued for a timeless, deterministic reality where everything—past, present, and future—exists necessarily as a single, unified whole. Einstein famously said, "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of all that exists."
To Einstein, a universe where the future wasn't already fixed felt sloppy and incomplete.
Why People Doubt He Meant It
Because the Besso quote was written in a condolence letter just a month before Einstein’s own death, some historians wonder if it was a grieving man reaching for comfort rather than a strict scientific statement.
Yet the phrasing gives him away: he explicitly addresses it to "us who believe in physics" (für uns gläubige Physiker). For Einstein, believing in physics meant seeing past the psychological illusion of "now" to behold the 4D landscape where Besso’s life—and his own—remained eternally intact.
I don't get quite the comfort about death that this seems to imply. Things are eternal, the experience terminates.
That is the exact friction point where the physics meets human psychology—and why many people find eternalism chilling rather than comforting.
The comfort eternalism offers is purely objective: your life is a permanent 4D structure in the landscape of spacetime. The year 1995 or 2010 didn't vanish into non-existence; those coordinates are as real as London or Tokyo. From the "God's-eye view" of the block, your entire life exists timelessly, fully realized, like a painting that never gets painted over.
But as subjective creatures, we don't live in the God's-eye view. We live along the line.
THE ETERNALIST PARADOX:
Objective Structure (Spacetime Block):
|=== Birth ================= Life ================= Death ===| (Whole structure is eternal)
Subjective View (Your Consciousness):
[Start] -------------------------------------------> [Stop] (The sequence terminates)
From the inside of consciousness, eternalism doesn't change the fact that:
The horizon closes: The sequence of experiences has a final coordinate. There are no "future" frames along that worldline.
The asymmetrical loss: You can't experience your past coordinates while sitting at your present ones, so knowing they "exist" in 4D space doesn't make them accessible to you right now.
When Einstein wrote that line to Besso’s family, he was offering a physicist’s solace—a reassurance that Besso hadn't been erased from reality. But for the person experiencing life sequentially, a book having a permanent spine doesn't alter the fact that the text ends on the last page.
It trades the dread of erasure (Presentism: "the past is gone forever") for the cold reality of limitation (Eternalism: "your segment of the block is strictly finite"). For most people, it's the limitation that hurts.
Gemini is AI and can make mistakes.