You don't understand (at least really understand in your gut) what is
wrong with socialism until you've been there. The regime can be benign,
as Vietnam's was after the first couple years, or like Castro's Cuba
is, and things still slowly deteriorate. The reason is pretty obvious
-- when you fine people for doing business outside the official
businesses, there is no entrepreneurship. Everyone just concentrates
on working the system rather than actually taking risks and working
hard. The economy loses the benefit of the incentives to get rich and
to see to it one's offspring are better off than you are.
Of course capitalism suffers from greed and exploitation and periodic
panics (not that socialist societies don't have that too in different
ways) and so the horses have to have reigns and blinders and so on.
When "new thinking" came to Vietnam about twenty years ago (following
what had happened in China), there was a sudden boost in agricultural
production and everyone (typical Asian mind set) went into business for
themselves. All that the government did then was stop prohibiting small
family and neighborhood enterprises -- the big things stayed government
owned. Since then even this has relaxed, especially to draw foreign
investment, and a few large enterprises have been spun off to private
hand and there is now a Saigon stock exchange. (Foreigners have no
business being in it except maybe through a fund, and even then I would
say be very wary).
The present government does seem to be on a course of emulating places
like Sweden rather than Cuba (an obvious failure -- in his honest
moments when he sheds his massive ego, even Fidel admits this). The
problem of course is what to do with the Party and its favored position
-- as of course the ranks of the Party don't want to give this up, and
having a selected group of vetted people run things avoids partisanship
and elective corruption and stupid voters and even stupider politicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment