Youth and the political left and selfish voters

Young people have always tended to the left, and then as they mature their politics matures, not necessarily to the right (young right-wingers are another group who tend to be extremists) but more toward the center.

One unfortunate thing about young people and politics -- they tend to be just as greedy and "what's in it for me" as older people, and in their case that often has to do with financial assistance to go to college.  It's easy for a politician to promise free tuition or some such thing, and thereby, with such a lie, get a lot of college-age votes (who tend to know it's a lie but vote for them anyway, just in case).

This has long been identified as a problem with all democracies -- the vast majority "vote their pocketbooks" rather than what is best for the country, and even rationalize things to think that what is best for them is best for the country.  People are selfish and when you point it out they find ways to convince themselves they are good people in spite of their selfishness.

Trump's massive misinformation

"Misinformation" is, of course, a lie, but a particularly dangerous and malicious form of lie.  It is usually in the form of a degrading assertion about a person or movement that may have a kernel of truth or may be invented out of whole cloth.

The purpose is not to win an argument, and if challenged the assertion is dropped and the  challenge ignored or given some sort of hand wave.
What happens is the reader may forget the exact accusation, but is unavoidably left with a negative or uncomfortable sense about the person attacked.

This is the way Trump got the Republican nomination and it seems now this is the way he and his operatives plan to get the Presidency.  Unfortunately the internet works well for this sort of thing, although misinformation has been around a lot longer than the internet and seems to work elsewhere too.

We need to remember that because someone says some is "weak" at this or "selfish" at that or "dishonest" or whatever and either provides no evidence or only provides evidence that in no way demonstrates the accusation, what is being done is you are being manipulated.

God as a scientific matter

Whether or not there is a God is not a scientific matter, and trying to make it one is kinda useless.  All science can tell us is there is no reason to think there is one, not a shred of reason.  It's kind of like trying to use science to proves there are no unicorns.  The fact that we cannot find one doesn't prove they don't exist -- excuses can be thought up -- but it is not a  basis for belief.

The point is you can't prove a negative -- it is never possible to use science to prove something does not exist.  People who base a belief in Gods and such on the fact that there is no proof they don't exist can only be pitied, as they are obviously entrapped by their childhood indoctrination.

That doesn't mean there is nothing we can do.  Given a claimed God with this or that claimed property, such as infinite power or infinite beneficence, as we hear all the time, it is not difficult to point to things that demonstrate such claims are logically and necessarily false.  The existence of suffering is an example, and there are many others.  Here, again, all that can be offered are excuses, and this is not basis for belief. 

Police brutality and bigotry

People who become police officers very often (although of course not always) have their own set of problems with authority, are "into" uniforms and guns and night sticks and sirens and so on, and generally have an exaggerated self-righteousness (they are serving the public so how dare anyone talk back or disobey or throw them the finger)!.  Lots of them are plain racists and homophobes and bigots of other various sorts.  Vetting and training can help, but it is not widespread nor anywhere near complete enough.  

The public of course doesn't help.  For the most part they are underpaid and certainly not appreciated, and generally ignored, but this they have to expect.  It goes with the territory.  After all, they chose to become cops.

"A policeman's lot is not a happy one,"  and, "We should have thought of that before we joined the force." 

By the way, this is not a uniquely American problem.  It is the case everywhere, and in America at least demands for bribes are not normal routine.

Cliché time about aging

Cliché time:  We have no choice but to live in the present, so make the best of it.  Also, I like being older and more mature and, in fact, wiser.  We do learn as we experience life.

I had a doctor and we were sitting together going over some test results, and he kept saying, "For your age, that's normal." Sheesh!  I found another doctor who will treat me, not just blame my age.  So what if I have a problem that is common in people my age -- that does not mean I have to have it if there are things to be done. 

Right now I'm prospering.  Reflux and hay fever work together to produce a problematic cough that interferes with sleep, and the drugs that deal with these are less than optimal (one raises blood pressure and another presents threats of pneumonia and kidney problems), so I cough a lot.  No aches and pains though, and lots of stamina, and I no longer use glasses except for very small print.

One other thing -- in the old days I had to get up every day and go to work.  Now I get up when I want to (ironically even earlier than I use to -- but I don't have to).  I thought I enjoyed my work; I enjoy gardening and  puttering and the internet a lot more.

Constitutional monarchs

I find it a happy thing that some of the happiest countries in the world have constitutional monarchs connected to historic but not longer widely believed religions.  It forms a basis for the ceremonial and past cultures of their nations.  A house-broken monarch is a good thing to have, and I always find anti-monarchical types a bore.

Afterlife speculation

I like a lot of others have reasons to think that there is an afterlife, however, there is no way to show any mechanism for how this works nor any unbiased way to test the various claims.  Therefore it is just speculation.  I have no problem with this sort of thing so long as it is clearly labeled as speculation and not as a teaching.  I have to say though that I, and a lot of others, have little patience with people who have claims that have no objective basis and still people get in a huff if they are ridiculed or otherwise questioned.

Alzheimer's is not the fault of the patient

There are so many people who have done everything "right" and still get Alzheimer's (Reagan comes to mind) that I doubt much can be done to prevent it if it is in the cards.  That doesn't mean one shouldn't be active, both mentally and physically, but those who are unlucky here are not to blame for it.  I suppose maybe a small percent of cases can be prevented, but it will take medical interventions we now do not have to make a major dent.  That of course is no reason not to do all those things -- they help in all sorts of ways.

Self-selected police

I have to say I really do have a problem with the self-selection that seems unavoidable, as who wants to be a cop, who wants to be a lawyer, who wants to hold political office, and a lot of similar things.  Anyone who actually wants to be these things should automatically be disqualified.  

As I understand it, the ancient Athenians had a solution, although it wouldn't work and didn't work, maybe it might with some tweaking.  Officeholders were chosen at random (except those in charge of the waterworks, where expertise was needed), people had to bring their own lawsuits and represent themselves in court, and the police consisted of slaves who were told to do a good job and observe the law or go to the mines.  Laws were passed by the assembly of all male citizens -- not a wise idea as it lead to a series of decisions that resulted in loss of the Peloponnesian War and conquest by Sparta.  It also meant effective orators, like Pericles or Demosthenes, had inordinate and inappropriate and ultimately disastrous influence.

Thinking about death

As we age we of course think about death, as well as about dementia and loss of independence and so on.   I've had a string of illnesses within the last decade or so, and in each case have recovered, it seems, almost completely, and I find no reduction in my mental ability.  I think it's like physical exercise, you have to use your brain to keep it functioning, and learning languages is my forte so now I'm learning one -- and one that turns out to be more difficult than I expected (like other Austronesian languages it is free of Indo-European case and tense and gender and number nonsense, but the vocabulary and pronunciation are a b****).

(As English has evolved it has lost a lot of this stuff too, and replaced it with scads of prepositions and verb helpers, which leads to the possibility of unbelievably subtle distinctions -- in this context I should also mention its supply of suffixes and prefixes -- not available to Asian languages -- which is where the massive vocabulary really comes from.)  Austronesian languages are direct and succinct and verbosity is almost impossible.  So is subtlety and ambiguity.  I don't know which is better.  At least Khmer lacks the tones that complicate Vietnamese pronunciation -- tones that came from Chinese influence (contamination).

Of course if you get something like Alzheimer's, then all this comes to naught, so I hope I will be lucky.  There is such a thing as good and bad luck, and as the cliché goes, we have to play the cards we are dealt.

Being an intellectual type, I am of course by nature disorganized, but fortunately I have the money to hire a secretary, and he keeps me marvelously organized.  My word what a stress reducer that is to know where things are!

Stress

Stress is far more harmful to our health than we imagine, and, worse, its effects accumulate.  Included in the term are anger, worry, fear, irritation, disease, inflammation, dehydration, insufficient sleep, etc. -- one notices that not all the sources of stress are mental.

I am not persuaded that meditation is the only solution, nor that it necessarily works for everyone, but, at a minimum we should learn at least a little about it and try it out.  Anger management and worry management (learning to see things in many perspectives) also help, but so do things like good hygiene and getting medical help for depression and other mental problems (yes, taking medication when indicated).  Just being organized does wonders.  So of course is being active.

I have gone to some extremes now to put stress out of my life.  I live in a quiet, peaceful farm surrounded by children and animals and people eager to teach me Khmer.  I have a garden, a special meditation room (just bigger than a closet with a cot and some family pictures and a couple icons), several pets, a completely dark bedroom used for nothing but sleep, a chestful of approved medicines for anything that bothers me (aches, reflux, sneezing, etc.), a near vegetarian diet (fish and field mice and shellfish and eggs are allowed) and a spectacular view of rice fields with woodlands in the far distance.  I also have the Internet and now a huge music collection.

Still, one does not escape stress.  It rained yesterday -- tropical rain, wonderful, unbelievably heavy, warm, muddy, and a blessing to the farmers, but also a signal to some sort of ant or termite to send out their males by the uncountable billions, and now my house and all the floors and everywhere are buried in their corpses.  It will be hours before we get back to normal.  The thing to do is find it funny, not find it a chore, and to wonder at nature.  

Well, that's my two cents worth on the subject.

Fascism in America and Europe

That nations will and should form alliances is just so basic I have to completely discount the mental ability of anyone who thinks otherwise.

There is present in all countries and within all segments of every population certain segments who are bigots -- against and generally hating anything different from what they happen to be -- misogynist if male, anti-male if female; racist if any race except their own, homophobic if straight and against "breeders" if gay; always anti-foreigner and anti-immigration; extremely patriotic (actually the word is jingoist since patriotism is a noble emotion); even thinking (without knowing others) that their particular language is the most beautiful and expressive in the world.  

These are the people you find voting for demagogues like Trump and much of the Brexit support.  These are the ones who insist o their "right" to have a gun and who are homophobic and racist and anti-immigration and "true" Christians or Muslim terrorists.  In short, these are the people who carry out things like the Holocaust -- they are Fascists.  

I speak of this from a Cambodia/American, and I fear it is coming to America and Europe.  In fact I am terrified.

Need to believe

Some people seem to have a need to believe, and can't leave their views in the realm of just opinion.  I don't understand it.  It seems to me whenever someone claims something odd, the natural expectation should be skepticism and it is foolish to be otherwise.
I imagine that there exists a personality trait ranging from cynicism through skepticism and ending up in gullibility (if not schizophrenia).  What I don't understand is how cynical those who want to believe something can be when presented with counter-evidence, or even just good hard questions.

Jehovah's Witnesses and others expecting the end of the world soon

A few observations.
First, most new religious movements are apocalyptic.  We see it in both Paul and in the stories about Jesus.  Luther claimed the then-reigning Pope was the anti-Christ.  Seventh-day Adventists and Mormons both show this.
Second, with JWs, I think the hold on them is emotional, not rational.  They are given a vision of an eternal paradise they will live in forever (not heavenly but much more down to earth, with things like lions for pets).  Second, they are given the notion, over and over, that they must remain loyal or they will lose out forever.  This is all playing on wishful thinking and on fear.  Also, they quote the Bible constantly, although as a general rule the Bible text quoted does little if anything to support their point and when it does there are many other possible interpretations.  They are, of course, selective, as are all fundamentalists, as to the passages they prefer.
This is the sad consequence of the Protestant doctrine that the Bible is God's Word, which any reasoning and unindoctrinated person can easily see it is not.  However, the approach does work with some people already indoctrinated that way.
Finally, the idea that we are living in the last days has a certain logic -- a lot of people think we are doomed since technology has changed the world so rapidly and mass communication makes all the world's problems so visible.  There is also the egoistic notion, "I am important, so the times I live in must be important.

Greed, racism, immigration and Brexit

The way I see it America is a nation composed almost entirely of illegal immigrants.  None of the original European population went there legally and they stole the land for the most part.  Even later immigrants for the most part just arrived.  It wasn't until the twentieth century that restrictions were imposed (at first on a racist basis against Chinese).
There is nothing really unusual about the American story.  Vietnam stole most of its territory from the Chom and the Khmer.  One wonders who they stole it from back in prehistory.  The Indo-European speakers stole most of their land from earlier inhabitants.  It goes on and on -- even the Native Americans constantly fought and periodically wiped out one of their tribes.
What is really behind resistance to immigration is a combination of fear (of Muslims mainly) and greed (I got mine, and I don't want to share).  The plain fact is that mixing peoples of different types almost always leads to difficulties of one sort or another -- mankind is evil that way.  There are some however who rise above these primitive instincts.  As we just saw in Britain, they tend to be a minority.

Non-god gods

I Comment again on pantheism and Taoism and transcendentalism and Spinoza's god and deism and all these things that to me are much the same as they see the existence of some sort of force in the universe but not a purposeful God, or at least with odd purposes from our point of view.
The problem I have with them is that they create the problems created by theism and offer no better solution.  The problem of suffering being the main one.  If you assert the existence of any of these forces, how do you explain suffering (evil is another issue --- one can have suffering, and there is plenty of it -- without postulating evil).  The only escape is to assert that the force doesn't care or has some longer range intention -- and that is the essence of the theist escape from this issue.
They also strike me as ways of concealing what is in effect another invocation of the god of the gaps.  The theists at least are honest here -- they say God did it -- and we know the problems of this and how unacceptable this it is, in the end, but isn't all these other approaches much the same thing, except putting the entity at a greater distance and calling it something else?
Again, the issues of absence of apparent purpose in the world or of an ethical authority -- these theories (if I may call them that) have the same problems that outright theism has.  If purpose comes from God, then there is no purpose but God's purpose, and what happens when he achieves it?  If right and wrong come from some force why not call it God, and why follow it anyway?  What if it tells you to do something wrong?    We much generate our own purpose and reason out our own ethics as best we can, disregarding authority, culture, and so on and depend entirely on philosophical reasoning (the Utilitarians, Kant and Socrates [Plato] are good helps here, as is basic Buddhist teaching, none of which are based on any claim to any sort of external being or force and which are based only on thinking the good and the bad of things in as much detail as possible, without a claim to either special knowledge nor to assurance that one will always be right.

Brain and subjective experience

I can imagine a number of ways there might be an afterlife.  Perhaps sentience is a property of existence we haven't identified and it behaves like a normal electromagnetic wave, propagating itself, and when it finds a good live unoccupied brain (in the fetus one supposes) it goes in and parasitizes it (actually the relationship is probably more symbiotic), and then goes elsewhere when that brain dies.  More likely when the brain dies it also dies, as otherwise we have to find a way for it to leave the sinking ship and find another baby.

I do agree with those who say sentience is unexplained, and it seems unexplainable.  As with a lot of things, this does not give me the right to insert the supernatural.  It could, as I just said, be nothing more than an undiscovered aspect of nature.  The brain has chemicals that can be associated with certain emotions and subjective experiences, but they are not those emotions and experiences but just an association, and this explains little.  Still, mind can go while brain remains, but when this happens it seems to be associated with brain malfunction -- to me a pretty big clue that sentience depends on brain.