I love it; I'm watching this movie called "The Bible" with amateur production values, and it has Adam crawling around rocks naked, hiding nothing, but with a tan line.
Ha, that tan line detail is a great catch! It sounds like you might be watching the 1966 John Huston film The Bible: In the Beginning... — the Adam scenes feature a very young and very naked Michael Parks crawling around what was actually an Italian backlot standing in for the Garden of Eden. That would explain both the low-fi feel and the, uh, anatomical authenticity. Fernby Films
The tan line is a delightfully human detail to slip through on a biblical epic — very much a "we tried our best" production moment. It's one of those things that pulls you right out of the mythological and into "this is just a guy from California who works outdoors."
Are you enjoying it overall, or is it more of a so-bad-it's-good watch?
Vivaldi in the background is nice.
That's a lovely touch! Vivaldi pairs surprisingly well with sweeping creation imagery — there's something about the baroque energy that feels both ancient and alive. The Four Seasons especially has that quality of evoking nature in a way that would suit an Eden scene nicely.
Do you know which piece they're using, or is it just playing in the background while you watch?
He has shoulder lenghth hair. That would require a few months.
Ha, exactly — so Adam emerges fully formed from the dust of the earth, but apparently also needed a few months of hair growth first. The internal logic is a bit shaky!
It's one of those fun anachronisms in biblical epics where you can tell the filmmakers were going for a certain aesthetic (long-haired, vaguely Renaissance painting look) without thinking too hard about the implications. Michelangelo's Adam has that same flowing hair, so they were probably just chasing that visual.
No facial hair though.
So he had time to grow the hair but apparently shaves every morning in Eden! Maybe Eve got a razor tree in addition to the apple tree.
It's such a classic Hollywood convention — the leading man stays clean-shaven no matter the setting. Even in "the dawn of creation," there are apparently grooming standards to uphold. Can't have your Adam looking too scruffy.
I would call this soft porn. Eve is similarly unadorned, but very white skin and not nearly as cute as Adam. They are doing things but Adam doesn't get arounsed.
Ha, that's pretty much the classic definition of tasteful biblical nudity — everyone's technically unclothed but it's all very carefully choreographed to stay just on the respectable side of things. The stark contrast between his tan and her very pale skin does sound like a very 1960s casting choice — they clearly put more thought into finding a photogenic Adam.
And yes, the lack of any biological realism is very much a feature, not a bug, in these productions. It keeps it firmly in the "artistic" category rather than crossing any lines — which probably helped it get past censors in 1966. The whole thing has that quality of being just daring enough to feel edgy for its time while still being showable in church halls.
Well they mock make love and Eve says, "I'm so hungry," and the scene jumps to David and Bathsheba enjoying fruit at a banquet. Enough.
That's actually pretty clever editing — the hunger line doing double duty as both literal and metaphorical, then cutting straight to a lavish feast as a kind of winking commentary. Someone in the editing room had a sense of humor.
It sounds like a fun oddity of a film — equal parts earnest and unintentionally campy. The tan line alone makes it worth watching a few minutes of!
Yes but I wanted to see how they would manage the talking snake.
That's the real cliffhanger isn't it! The talking snake is always the great challenge of any Eden adaptation. Your options are basically:
- A normal snake with a dubbed-over voice (usually hilariously unconvincing)
- Some kind of shadowy supernatural presence the snake is just near
- A very dramatic close-up of a snake's face while a voice-over does the heavy lifting
It's the moment that separates the ambitious biblical epics from the ones that just quietly skip it or cut away. Did you stick around long enough to find out, or did the David and Bathsheba fruit scene end your viewing?
The film stopped with Adam and Eve and jumped to David and (I assume Bathsheba, anyway a female dinner guest). This is a bit of a waste of your talents so I will let you go here. I'm not going to watch any more anyway, at least now.
Ha, well it was a fun little watch-along! The tan line and the razor-free Eden will stay with me. Enjoy the rest of your evening!
No comments:
Post a Comment