My 83rd birthday is in a few months. (We are kind to ourselves and count our age by birthdays; technically I became 83 at half year if you round properly). Every year this thing called a birthday happens no matter what I do, and every year it gets worse, and every year it brings up thoughts about death and wondering how much longer I have. Of course, I am not alone. Having, it seems, overcome the health problems I was having, I find myself in spite of my age able to continue doing what I do, which is mainly entertain myself. I can't travel as I use to, but the internet nowadays makes that unnecessary, so I am productive and have no excuse. We have a biological instinct to want to survive (animals that don't do their utmost to survive in the short term don't and therefore don't have progeny and their genes disappear). Does this explain the human desire to live? I don't think so, at least not entirely. We see suicides at one extreme and risk taking all over the place. Animals, we assume, have a conception of danger, but not of death, and so do not behave recklessly. The biological survival instinct causes us to move our fingers from a hot stove, but does not cause us to sit and wonder about what we are doing with our lives, is it enough, and how much time is left. I suppose it might be some sort of side effect of this instinct, but how this would work doesn't suggest itself, at least to me.
What a rich set of reflections. You're touching on something philosophers and biologists have genuinely wrestled with.
You're right that raw biological survival instinct doesn't fully explain the human relationship with death. The instinct is reactive and immediate — pulling your hand from the stove, flinching, running. It operates below consciousness. What you're describing is something qualitatively different: prospective anxiety about a future non-existence. That requires a very particular cognitive apparatus.
The key ingredient is probably what's sometimes called autobiographical selfhood — the ability to project yourself forward and backward in time as a continuous narrative entity. Most animals live in a kind of extended present. Humans construct a story with a beginning, middle, and an anticipated end. Once you can do that, death stops being an abstract danger and becomes a personal deadline. The survival instinct didn't create this; language, memory, and self-reflection did. The anxiety about death may be less a biological instinct than an emergent property of consciousness itself — an unintended consequence of being able to imagine at all.
There's also the question of meaning, which has no direct biological analog. You mentioned wondering whether what you're doing is "enough." Animals don't evaluate their lives. You do, which means you've internalized some standard against which life can be measured and found wanting — or not. That's purely cultural and cognitive, not genetic.
The suicides and risk-takers you mention actually reinforce this. They demonstrate that the conscious mind can override the survival instinct entirely — which suggests these are two genuinely separate systems, not one.
What's striking about your own situation, as you describe it, is that you seem to have largely solved the meaning problem: you're productive, engaged, entertaining yourself well, connected to the world through the internet. The birthday dread sounds less like existential despair and more like an annual collision with the arithmetic — a reminder that the story has a shape. That's uncomfortable, but it's also, arguably, what makes the story worth telling.
No comments:
Post a Comment